The foreign minister of Pakistan commented that NOOR-Ul-Haq Qadri, the cabinet minister of Pakistan should be more responsible during the sharing of a stage with Hafiz Saeed, the mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai Attack, recognizing the mistake enacted by governmental associator in this week.

The foreign minister of Pakistan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi publicly commented in a gathering of Washington while he was questioned about the activity of the cabinet minister who shared the same stage with the Chief of terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba in Islamabad at a meeting for discussions of the religious affairs, “ I will go home and certainly ask him he did that. But what I am told it was an event to highlight the situation in Kashmir ”.

Mr Qureshi said,” It had nothing to do with Lashkar-e-Taiba. There were other political elements there. He happened to be one of them.”

The Pakistan foreign minister also said, “ I think he (Mr Qadri) should have been more sensitive, but it was not that he subscribes to his point of view.”

The presence of Pakistan Cabinet Minister  Mr Qadri at the event with Hafiz Saeed, the Chief of terror group completely contended the stand of India towards terrorism and also exposed Pakistan’s actual attitude for the terror issues.

A member of the gathering from Institute of Peace of US, funded by the US Government questioned the foreign minister of Pakistan demanding the explanation why the cabinet minister of their country appeared in the same as with the Chief of the terrorist organization, Lashkar-e-Taiba which is banned in Pakistan.

Related Articles
Next Story
Going Viral
16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on  Border Wall Issue

16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on Border Wall Issue

by Haimantee Ghosh February 19, 2019
Sixteen United States indicted the US President Donald Trump’s administration over his decision to announce a national emergency to sponsor a wall on the Southern border with Mexico, claiming the move breached the constitution. The litigation, filed in a federal court in California, explained the order by the US President was contradictory to the Presentment Clause which figures out the legal proceedings and the Appropriations Clause, which defines Congress as...