Washington (News Service) – On Monday the Christian Baker who vetoed from baking a cake for a gay couple was handed victory on narrow grounds. The Supreme Court judged the case of the Colorado-based baker on religious grounds.

Colorado Civil Rights Commission displayed a verboten rancor towards religion when it discovered that the baker Jack Philips tampered with the state anti-discrimination law by lashing out the gay couple. The laws of the state government barred any business to refuse service based on marital status, sex, race or sexual orientation.

At the verdict, the court announced that the Colorado-based baker Philips violated the religious rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. However, no defending ruling was issued by the justice. Important claims were not quoted in the case if preparing a cake is a type of representative act guarded by the free speech assurance of the Constitution.

“It’s hard to believe that the government punished me for operating my business consistent with my beliefs about marriage. That isn’t freedom or tolerance,” – said Philips while delivering a statement.

Both the parties involved in the case claimed victory. The supporters of the couple asserted pressure on the ruling that it highlights gay rights, thus letting the business toe the line that they are open to every class of the society.

Today’s decision means our fight against discrimination and unfair treatment will continue,” – said Charlie Craig and Mullins in a statement.

“We have always believed that in America, you should not be turned away from a business open to the public because of who you are.” – They added.

Howbeit a major portion of the adults in the United States believe that the businesses should be granted permission to refuse from providing service on basis of sexual orientation.

Related Articles
Next Story
Going Viral
16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on  Border Wall Issue

16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on Border Wall Issue

by Haimantee Ghosh February 19, 2019
Sixteen United States indicted the US President Donald Trump’s administration over his decision to announce a national emergency to sponsor a wall on the Southern border with Mexico, claiming the move breached the constitution. The litigation, filed in a federal court in California, explained the order by the US President was contradictory to the Presentment Clause which figures out the legal proceedings and the Appropriations Clause, which defines Congress as...