On Wednesday the U.S President Donald Trump proposed an executive rollback of sitcom “Roseanne” was swayed while the White House did not safeguard while the White House announced that it would not defend Roseanne Barr’s anti-Semite tweet that provoked the decision.

Barr sparked his catholic anger on Twitter. He tweeted on Tuesday in contrast to the former president of the United States Obama. Barr wrote in a now-deleted message that the political movement from the Islamic regions “Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby = vj.”

The tweet made ways for the ABC Network, led by Walt Disney Co in order to abandon his revival of “Roseanne” sitcom. Trump has mentioned that the program’s vogue is a proof that his believers including Barr want to host shows that speak to their interests.

“Gee, he never called President Donald J. Trump to apologize for the HORRIBLE statements made and said about me on ABC. Maybe I just didn’t get the call?” – Tweeted the American President Donald Trump. However, his presidency and election campaign have been a true critic of the news media.

“The president is simply calling out the media bias. No one is defending what she said,”- said the White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders while elaborating the comments of the U.S president.

ROSEANNE BLAMES AMBIEN

“It was 2 in the morning and I was Ambien tweeting-it was Memorial Day too-I went 2 far ” do not want it defended-it was egregious Indefensible,”- wrote Roseanne, but later deleted the post. “I made a mistake I wish I hadn’t but…don’t defend it please.”- She added.

“While all pharmaceutical treatments have side effects, racism is not a known side effect of any Sanofi medication,”- Ambien’s maker Sanofi responded on Twitter.

Related Articles
Next Story
Going Viral
16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on  Border Wall Issue

16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on Border Wall Issue

by Haimantee Ghosh February 19, 2019
Sixteen United States indicted the US President Donald Trump’s administration over his decision to announce a national emergency to sponsor a wall on the Southern border with Mexico, claiming the move breached the constitution. The litigation, filed in a federal court in California, explained the order by the US President was contradictory to the Presentment Clause which figures out the legal proceedings and the Appropriations Clause, which defines Congress as...