According to the latest reports, Jimmy Iovine, Music mogul and Dr, Dre, have been ordered to pay $25.2m (£19.2m) to their former partner “Beats”, which later became a music streaming service as well as a headphone company, acquired by Apple Music in a $3bn deal in 2014.

Steven Lamar, took the idea to Dre and Iovine in 2006 when the first Beats headphones were released two years later, based on a design by Robert Brunner. Only one model, Beats Studio, was specified but Lamar argued the design had been carried over to a dozen different models and sought $130m (£99m) in royalties.

At the center of their dispute was a 2007 settlement, in which Dre and Iovine agreed to pay Lamar 4% of the base price of every headphone they sold. The trial saw Dre and Iovine testify about the origin of Beats – a story they told at length in the recent HBO documentary series The Defiant Ones.

Lamar’s lawyer said, “the jury had seen through their attempts to gloss over his client’s role. They tried to paint him as some guy who was just there at the right time and the right place, and they already had the idea”. he also added, “I don’t think that was it at all and I think we proved just the opposite: That before they met Lamar, they hadn’t thought about this and he gave it to them on a silver platter.

He added: “For anybody who has a great idea and brings it to a company and then doesn’t get the recognition or credit that they’re due… what this jury verdict says is, if that happens to you and you’re a little person, you can go into court and have a jury of American citizens determine whether you’re right or wrong.

“And if you’re right, you get the credit that you’re owed.”

Related Articles
Next Story
Going Viral
16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on  Border Wall Issue

16 States Indicts the US President Due to Emergency Declaration on Border Wall Issue

by Haimantee Ghosh February 19, 2019
Sixteen United States indicted the US President Donald Trump’s administration over his decision to announce a national emergency to sponsor a wall on the Southern border with Mexico, claiming the move breached the constitution. The litigation, filed in a federal court in California, explained the order by the US President was contradictory to the Presentment Clause which figures out the legal proceedings and the Appropriations Clause, which defines Congress as...