On Thursday a federal sued court for awarding Jay-Z in a copyright infringement lawsuit asserting the rapper for nibbling without the consent of the Egyptian composer for his song “Big Pimpin” that had been a big hit in 1999.
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California ruled 3-0 against the American rapper. The nephew of the late composer Baligh Hamdy did not hold the legal rights to obtain copyright claims over Hamdy’s song “Khosara Khosara” released in 1957.
Carlos Bea the circuit judge said the nephew Osama Ahmed Fahmy, failed to bring a suit against Jay-Z and hip-hop producer Timbaland completely as the laws of Egypt has identified an “inalienable moral right” of composers to gadget the unethical use of copyrighted products.
“Even in Egypt, Fahmy’s moral rights would be insufficient to win him anything but an injunction,” – said Bea.
He later added that the courts in the United States would not enforce Fahmy’s moral rights over the song, however, the Egyptian laws enabled individuals such as Jay-Z to pay for the permission to revamp songs.
“This is a seminal decision from this circuit on moral rights,” Christine Lepera, a lawyer for the defendants, said in an email. “The plaintiff did not have economic rights in the allegedly infringed ‘Khosara’ composition, and thus no right to sue for infringement.”
“Big Pimpin’” was a single from Jay-Z’s 1999 album “Vol. 3: Life and Times of S. Carter.”
An instant response to the comments was not demanded by the lawyer for Fahmy. Shawn Carter and Timothy Mosley had acquired the public domain in 2000 but paid EMI Music Arabia $100,000 in order to gain song rights after the objection.